Hello, Our program uses 4 participant groups.  Previously when we ran the preview option we would be asked to select which group (A through D) we would like to select.  Currently, when running the preview option, a blank tab/screen appears.  One would have to click on the prior tab to see the group selection option.  This may be very minor but it could be helpful if the group selection window would be the active screen when the preview button is pressed so that one does not miss it. Thanks!

Hi,

I tried using the multi_select functionality in choice response type and also include the "other" option, with the possibility for participants to type in their own answer. When used separately, both functions work fine but they don't seem to work together. The follow_up_response thing no longer appears. Could you please help me on that?

Thank you for your help!
Best,
Stella

Hi,

I have another issue regarding the carryover response functionality. I would like to use one carryover response as the next stimulus more than once because I want my participants to evaluate their response on more than one question. But I seem to run into errors when I do that. Could you please look into it?

Quote:  "eval_absurd_1": {
    "type": "basic",
    "stimuli": [
      {"which": ["1a", "%r:TestingBlockA|main_absurd_1|text_response",
                "q_absurd"], "location": [2,5,8]}
    ],

    "stimulus_pattern": {"order": "random"},
    "responses": ["a"]

  },
 
    "eval_annoying_1": {
    "type": "basic",
    "stimuli": [
      {"which": ["1a", "%r:TestingBlockA|main_absurd_1|text_response",
                "q_annoyed"], "location": [2,5,8]}
    ],

    "stimulus_pattern": {"order": "random"},
    "responses": ["a"]

  }

Hi!
I'm designing a self-paced reading experiment (tokenized text, masked, forward_mask: true). For one word 'he' I would like to have the mask be 3 characters (xxx) instead of two, to make 'he' indistinguishable from 'she' when they are masked. Is there a way to do this while keeping the general shape of the words/sentence visible (so not masking all spaces)?
Thanks!

I was looking for guidance on what the syntax would be for utilizing the carryover response (collected in a naming trial) as the target response value in a testing trial. Each testing trial has 4 images and the "correct" target choice is the item corresponding to what they hear (audio stim) currently using the syntax from the documentation in the carryover response with involves the %s.
Thank you and let me know if you need more context.

Hi Everyone, 
We are trying to code a multiple choice question. But, we want code the question and responses like in the following image like spreadsheet. Is there any way to code it on FindingFive? If not, what could be an alternative.
   

Thank you very much for your time and consideration!

Hi FF team,

I'm trying to upload some stimuli, but have been failing all day. I've put them in a zip folder the size of which is 157MB and we have 900MB free from our storage allowance. I've tried uploading with firefox AND chrome, and cannot do it. I just get stuck at the "uploading the zip archive step" for hours and i cannot understand what's the problem. Surely 150MB should upload quickly, i've uploaded much more with the current internet connection, so i doubt that could be the reason.
Your help would be appreciated!

Best,
bissera

Hi, 
Is it possible to show carryover responses together with the original stimuli to participants? I would like to use previous participant responses as stimuli in the subsequent part of my studies, but I also need to show the original stimuli along with their previous responses. 

Thank you in advance!
Best regards,

Hi,
I'd like to set up multiple choice questions with the option "Other" and a textbox next to it, so that participants can write their own answer if they choose it. I could not find an option for that from the documentation (https://help.findingfive.com/api/responses.html). Can I do this somehow?

Thanks!

Hi guys,
I am having trouble with some of my participants. They are apparently able to access studies for which I did not send them links.
My studies are launched on FF directly, with an access code, and I send the link to my participants. They are divided into three groups and should participate in a definite number of studies. 
A participant wrote this morning saying that each time he clicks a link he has access to the three types of studies. How is that possible? How can I fix it? More surprising, this is not the case for everyone, most of my participants only have access to the studies they should. 
Many thanks!
Marjolaine