Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 118 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 115 Guest(s) Applebot, Bing, SemrushBot
|
Latest Threads |
Error question
Forum: Platform Improvement
Last Post: jane_lutken
09-11-2025, 11:31 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 507
|
Syntax Error "Expecting p...
Forum: Platform Improvement
Last Post: noah.nelson
07-25-2025, 04:16 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,357
|
Choice response location
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: wbushong
07-17-2025, 03:06 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 893
|
Limiting audio replays
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: ytgu
06-09-2025, 07:05 PM
» Replies: 6
» Views: 2,350
|
text stimuli presented as...
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: jane_lutken
05-15-2025, 12:09 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,462
|
Jumping Position of my St...
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: Ting
05-15-2025, 09:08 AM
» Replies: 19
» Views: 5,989
|
Custom validation for ema...
Forum: General Feedback
Last Post: Ting
05-10-2025, 09:11 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 2,212
|
Study with audio is not w...
Forum: Experimental Design
Last Post: Ting
05-03-2025, 09:24 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 1,912
|
Experiment not working on...
Forum: Platform Improvement
Last Post: noah.nelson
04-24-2025, 03:28 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 2,359
|
Self-paced listening
Forum: Experimental Design
Last Post: noah.nelson
04-09-2025, 05:52 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 1,857
|
|
|
random item selection |
Posted by: ytgu - 06-20-2023, 06:37 PM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Hi!
I wonder if FF allows us to randomly select from a pool of sentences and administer them to each subject?
For example, for Block A & Block B, we have 36 items in total, and we'd like the program to randomly administer 12 sentences (6 go to Block A, 6 go to Block B, and we don't want repetition within these randomly chosen 12 sentences).
Please let me know if any of this doesn't make sense to you!
Thank you so much,
Yuting
|
|
|
reaction time logged between visual target and the key press |
Posted by: ytgu - 05-30-2023, 10:56 PM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- Replies (6)
|
 |
Hi Ting,
For my study, participants first listen to an audio sentence, at the offset of the sentence, a visual target will appear on the screen, participants need to press a key to indicate if the visual target and the final word of the heard audio sentence is a match or mismatch.
When I looked at the data, I found that the actual RTs should equal to "trial_duration" minus the length of the audio file but not the values in the column "response_rt". Is there a way to directly log the actual RTs that I want onto the FF results spreadsheet?
Thank you!
Yuting
|
|
|
Changing the font of a part of a target |
Posted by: Paweł Stefański - 05-11-2023, 02:45 PM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- Replies (4)
|
 |
Hello All.
I am working on a new study and I need to change the size, or colour, or make bold only a one word/phrase of the response sentence. For example, in the following response: 'to beat around the bush' , I would like the word 'bush' to be bold, and the other words to have 'regular' font. As an alternative, it can have different colour or size. I know the program allows a researcher to adjust the size of the whole response, but is it possible to change the part of it to be bold? (or change its colour or?).
If yes, how should I create a particular command?
Thank you in advance!
Kind regards
Paweł
|
|
|
within-subject blocking within a between-subject design |
Posted by: ytgu - 05-06-2023, 01:56 AM - Forum: Experimental Design
- Replies (2)
|
 |
Hello!
I wonder how I could counterbalance the order of "test_noise" and "test_accent" for a between-subject design? Subjects should be randomly assigned to Group 1, 2, or 3, but they will complete both noise test and accent test, and I wish to counterbalance the order of these 2 test blocks. Here's my code:
"block_sequence": [
"General_Instruction", "Subject_ID", "Sound_check",
{"Group1":["c_practice", "c_exposure_1", "c_exposure_2", "c_exposure_3", "c_test_noise", "c_test_accent", "c_baseline"],
"Group2":["n_practice", "n_exposure_1", "n_exposure_2", "n_exposure_3", "n_test_noise", "n_test_accent", "n_baseline"],
"Group3":["a_practice", "a_exposure_1", "a_exposure_2", "a_exposure_3", "a_test_noise", "a_test_accent", "a_baseline"]}
"Survey"]
Thanks!
|
|
|
FAQ - participant payments |
Posted by: AshMcD - 02-10-2023, 05:30 PM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- No Replies
|
 |
Q: How can I reimburse my participants for being in my study?
A: For studies launched directly on FindingFive, you can maintain an account balance to pay participants. Using the money in that account there are 3 ways participants can choose to be reimbursed. We support paying participants directly via PayPal or a digital gift card (including a digital debit card option). Alternatively, students can also receive course credit.
For studies launched on Mechanical Turk, payment is processed by Amazon. We will check your AWS account balance to make sure it has enough funds to cover the cost of your study session before launching it.
You are also welcome to arrange payment outside of the FindingFive platform.
For more information on payments and course credits, you can visit our Researcher FAQ page.
|
|
|
Relaunch Sessions with Stimulus Files |
Posted by: Ting - 12-01-2022, 09:48 AM - Forum: Known Issues
- No Replies
|
 |
Dear Researchers,
We have discovered an issue with how stimulus files were handled in the latest study grammar version. If you had launched a session in the past week that required external stimulus files, it might have reported network errors to participants. This issue is now fixed, thanks to the timely report by Yilmaz Dogukan Ozlu from University of Arizona.
We highly recommend stopping the current session and launching a new one. You only need to do so if: - Your session is launched under the latest Study Grammar version (i.e., you previewed your experiment within the last 2 weeks)
- Your experiment uses stimulus files.
You are not affected if you haven't launched a new session within the past two weeks.
We apologize for the inconvenience caused by this technical issue. Thank you so much for your patience, and we'll strive to further improve our infrastructure to minimize the chances of such incidents in the future.
Sincerely,
FindingFive
|
|
|
|