Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 47 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 43 Guest(s) Bing, Google, SemrushBot, Yandex
|
Latest Threads |
pseudorandomization multi...
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: Ting
04-17-2024, 03:23 PM
» Replies: 3
» Views: 87
|
Preview mode broken
Forum: Platform Improvement
Last Post: sten_knutsen
04-07-2024, 07:58 AM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 235
|
Cookie Error in MTurk
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: Ting
04-05-2024, 05:49 PM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 115
|
When it takes too long th...
Forum: Platform Improvement
Last Post: blueorange
03-19-2024, 08:06 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 308
|
150 trial limit
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: sac429
03-19-2024, 02:32 PM
» Replies: 2
» Views: 228
|
Is there a way to present...
Forum: Experimental Design
Last Post: Ting
02-20-2024, 09:30 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 894
|
Questions RE: Prolific Co...
Forum: Experimental Design
Last Post: Ting
02-14-2024, 09:44 AM
» Replies: 1
» Views: 322
|
Blank screen?
Forum: Platform Improvement
Last Post: mschenker
12-13-2023, 03:25 PM
» Replies: 4
» Views: 1,224
|
Tokenized Text Font + Unn...
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: Ting
11-15-2023, 06:38 PM
» Replies: 5
» Views: 1,563
|
One randomized word while...
Forum: Study Grammar & Management
Last Post: S Sommer
11-14-2023, 05:25 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 337
|
|
|
"continue" button and trial duration |
Posted by: [email protected] - 07-09-2021, 09:22 PM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- Replies (10)
|
|
Hello! :-)
I have a question about the "continue" button. I see on the study specification grammar website that FF will automatically determine when a trial gets a "continue" button based on whether the trial duration is set to 0sec or more. i.e a study that has a duration of more than 0 won't (necessarily) get a "continue" button, but one with no duration or defined responses will.
In my study I have trial templates with three stimuli all of which need to have different durations. The first needs to be 2000ms, the second 1000ms, and the third 500ms. None of the stimuli can have responses or buttons/button presses because they're meant to serve the same function roughly as fixations. In blocks they're yoked together with corresponding trial templates of three critical stimuli; essentially, one trial, composed of two trial templates, would be 2000ms pause >> critical stimulus >> 1000ms pause >> critical stimulus >> 500ms pause >> critical stimulus.
I've found that I can avoid the stimuli requiring responses or button presses when I define the trial duration. However, if I keep the trial duration, then each stimulus can't have an individual duration of its own (or it can, but it would disappear before the whole trial template moves on leaving a blank screen). I have also tried to set each individual stimulus duration to its own respective duration. However, when I go to comment out the whole trial duration, the "continue" button automatically appears again.
I'm wondering if there is a way to keep my code so that each stimulus can appear for its respective duration time (2000ms, 1000ms, and 500ms) without defining a trial duration and without the "continue" button automatically appearing?
Thank you so much!
Grace
|
|
|
Playback of recorded audio files |
Posted by: jwright8 - 07-05-2021, 02:23 PM - Forum: Platform Improvement
- Replies (1)
|
|
I have recorded audio files as a part of my experiment. I am now trying to listen to the .ogg files on my computer. Some of the files can be opened by normal audio players. However, some of the files are not opening with any audio player. I get an error saying that the file type or codec is not supported. What can we do about that? Thank you!
|
|
|
collaboration from different countries |
Posted by: aczyp - 07-05-2021, 08:23 AM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hello FindingFive,
I am trying to collaborate with someone who is currently based in China, while I am based in the EU and work on the EU server. My (intended) collaborator seems to be having trouble accessing FindingFive, setting up an account, and generally using the platform.
We are wondering what the trouble may be. Should they be logging in to another non-EU server? Is FindingFive simply not accessible from China? If yes, would there be any kind of workaround, short of collaborating via screenshare from my account only?
Any help will be much appreciated. Thank you, and best wishes, Anna
|
|
|
Access to Qualtrics while participating in FF study |
Posted by: Hyeonah - 07-01-2021, 08:32 PM - Forum: Experimental Design
- Replies (2)
|
|
Hello!
I wonder whether it is possible for participants to access the Qualtrics survey while they participate in the FF study.
Specifically, after reading the text in the FF, participants can see a screen where the Qualtrics link appears so if they click it, they might be prompted to move on to the Qualtrics survey.
Would this design be possible?
Thank you!
-Hyeonah
|
|
|
Link FF experiement to Prolific |
Posted by: [email protected] - 06-23-2021, 03:32 PM - Forum: Experimental Design
- Replies (3)
|
|
Hi,
Has anyone integrated their FF experiment to Prolific before? I wonder if, 1) Participants' prolific ID could be carried over to findingfive so they don't have to put in a participant ID, and 2) If participants have to create a findingfive account if they are from Prolific.
Thanks!
Haoyun
|
|
|
Auto-advance and feedback for keypress |
Posted by: [email protected] - 06-21-2021, 05:52 PM - Forum: Study Grammar & Management
- Replies (4)
|
|
Dear FF team,
For the keypress type, could it be auto-advanced? That is, whenever participants make a response, the current trial will end and advance to the next trial?
A second question, could correct responses/targets be set for keypress type so participants can get a feedback about right or wrong after each trial?
Thanks!
Haoyun
|
|
|
yoking trials from 3 templates |
Posted by: atfrederiksen - 06-09-2021, 07:06 PM - Forum: Experimental Design
- Replies (1)
|
|
I have previously had success with yoking together trials from two different templates. Now, I'm trying it with three templates, and it doesn't seem to work. I'm trying to yoke trials from a MouseReset, a Basic, and an AFC type template. Any suggestions?
|
|
|
|