07-11-2021, 01:37 PM
(This post was last modified: 07-11-2021, 01:40 PM by [email protected].)
(07-10-2021, 08:49 PM)Ting Wrote: Hi Grace,
Thanks for taking the time to explain your study design so clearly. May I ask a somewhat redundant question to make sure I understand the conundrum you are facing: the 2000ms, 1000ms, 500ms pauses are generated from the same trial template, correct? Because of that, it forces you to set the longest duration, 2000ms, as the trial duration for the template. When that happens, for the pauses that last only 1000ms and 500ms, it would leave a blank screen before the trial moves onto the critical stimulus.
Did I get this right? So you are essentially looking for a mechanism to let trials advance after a duration that is conditioned on how long the pauses should be?
Hi Ting,
Yes! That is exactly the conundrum that I am facing right now. I should also clarify that the pauses are in one trial template (which is where my current conundrum arises), and the critical stimuli are in another (this trial template runs smoothly), and these are the two trial templates that are yoked together in an alternating fashion to form one trial.
Thank you!
Grace