Posts: 11 
	Threads: 5 
	Joined: Apr 2022
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Hi,  
Is it possible to show carryover responses together with the original stimuli to participants? I would like to use previous participant responses as stimuli in the subsequent part of my studies, but I also need to show the original stimuli along with their previous responses.  
 
Thank you in advance! 
Best regards,
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 388 
	Threads: 22 
	Joined: Sep 2020
	
 Reputation: 
 2
	 
 
	
	
		Hi - of course! You can just use the nested list syntax to display multiple stimuli on a trial. The carryover response, when displayed as a stimulus, is just a stimulus. You can take a look at nested list syntax here:  https://help.findingfive.com/api/trial-t...ple-option
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 11 
	Threads: 5 
	Joined: Apr 2022
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		 (04-06-2022, 10:52 AM)Ting Wrote:  Hi - of course! You can just use the nested list syntax to display multiple stimuli on a trial. The carryover response, when displayed as a stimulus, is just a stimulus. You can take a look at nested list syntax here: https://help.findingfive.com/api/trial-t...ple-option 
Thank you very much!    
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 11 
	Threads: 5 
	Joined: Apr 2022
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Hi again, 
I am having troubles using the carryover response feature and FindingFive is not able to point me to a particular error. Could you please help me find what I could have done wrong?
 Quote:--Trial Templates  
"eval_annoying": { 
 
    "type": "basic", 
    "stimuli": [["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_annoyed"], 
                ["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_annoyed"], 
                ["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_annoyed"], 
                ["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_annoyed"], 
                ["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_annoyed"], 
                ["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_annoyed"]], 
    "stimulus_pattern": {"order": "random"}, 
    "responses": ["a"] 
 
  }, 
 
  "eval_absurd": { 
 
    "type": "basic", 
    "stimuli": ["%r:TestingBlock|main_absurd|text_response", 
                "q_absurd"], 
 
    "stimulus_pattern": {"order": "random"}, 
    "responses": ["a"] 
 
  }, 
 
  "eval_intention": { 
 
    "type": "basic", 
    "stimuli": ["%r:TestingBlock|main_annoying|text_response", 
                "q_intention"], 
 
    "stimulus_pattern": {"order": "random"}, 
    "responses": ["a2"], 
    "follow_up_responses": { 
      "a2":  
      [ {"match": "other", "responses": ["own_reason"]}  ] 
    } 
 
  } 
 
 
--Procedure 
 
  "TestingBlock": { 
      "trial_templates": ["main_absurd", "main_annoying"], 
      "pattern": {"order": "random", "repeat": 1} 
    }, 
 
    "EvalBlock": { 
      "trial_templates": ["eval_absurd", "eval_annoying", "eval_intention"], 
      "pattern": {"order": "fixed", "repeat": 1} 
    }, 
"main_annoying" and "main_absurd" are defined in the templates, too.
 
Thank you for your help! 
Best regards,
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 43 
	Threads: 3 
	Joined: Sep 2020
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Hi stellestrellaj, 
I'm sorry to hear that you're having trouble using the carryover response feature. Would you mind sharing the study with me ( [email protected]), and I'll take a look and see if I can determine what's going on?
 
Best, 
Rachel
	  
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 11 
	Threads: 5 
	Joined: Apr 2022
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Hi Rachel, 
 
I just did! Thank you so much for your help! 
 
Best,
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 388 
	Threads: 22 
	Joined: Sep 2020
	
 Reputation: 
 2
	 
 
	
	
		Hi  - this is a bug on our part. It'll be fixed tomorrow. Try again on Tuesday? Thanks for letting us know!
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	
	
	
		
	Posts: 11 
	Threads: 5 
	Joined: Apr 2022
	
 Reputation: 
 0
	 
 
	
	
		Hi, 
It worked! Thanks for all your help!   
	 
	
	
	
	
 
 
	 
 |