Ah thanks for the explanation. And my apologies - my guess turned out to be wrong. At the time being, the pseudorandom method only looks at whether an attribute exists, but not its value. I don't think that's the optimal behavior, as evidenced by your totally reasonable case.
We can spend a little time this week tweaking this feature so that it recognizes the actual values of the attribute and performs pseudorandomization on them. Would it be possible for you to check back in on this thread in a week or so? We'll post an update when the study grammar devs implement this feature.
Thanks
We can spend a little time this week tweaking this feature so that it recognizes the actual values of the attribute and performs pseudorandomization on them. Would it be possible for you to check back in on this thread in a week or so? We'll post an update when the study grammar devs implement this feature.
Thanks